Nate Coghlan
Blog two
Whistlin’ and Crowin’
After
reading Whistlin’ and Crowin’ Women of
Appalachia many of the common stereotypes about the culture are
contradicted. I found it surprising how different a culture that was so often
referred to as “hillbillies” could be so far from it. Although the Appalachian
culture does use its own unique form of language and secludes itself from the
modern society so many of us are used to this is done intentionally. When
reading about these extremely independent women and Sohn herself one theme
continues to stand out and that is a love for the hills in which they live.
After each of these three women have the opportunity to expand upon their
educations all three remain in Appalachia. I also found it interesting and surprising
that although this is a male dominated society women are far more likely to
graduate from high school. This strikes me as interesting because value for men
in Appalachia is found in the coalmines where education will take you further
in the rest of the country. This allows for women to continue their education
and for the most part generally have the best opportunities to leave
Appalachia.
When
reading Sohn’s book there were different things that I enjoyed reading and
other parts that were necessary but dry at times. One part that I liked reading
was each of the three women’s personal experience sections. This part allowed
the reader to really get to know the women that were being studied in this
dissertation and help me to understand the culture on a much more personal
level. As for something that I felt was extremely useful but didn’t enjoy
reading was the style in which it was written. Sohn used a very factual
structured format to present her case into how women of Appalachia could
substantially better themselves through further education. I understand why
Sohn chose to use this format, but as a reader it was relatively dry and at
times felt as if things were dragging on.
In
this book I felt that Sohn’s main purpose for was to break the on going
stereotypes of Appalachia specifically looking at women. I thought that Sohn
did a great job arguing the fact that women were better off with higher
education and also proved a point that Appalachian women are not all uneducated
housewives. However, I do disagree with a portion of her research when she was
trying to show the independence and strength of each of the women in her study.
By using subjects like Lucy and Sarah she unfortunately reinforced the
stereotype of uneducated stubborn men in Appalachia. In both women’s cases the
husbands did not support their educational endeavors and with Lucy the physical
abuse only adds to the negative perception.
Women of Appalachia was an eye-opening
book and although it does not relate to me beyond the scope of Athens it does
give me a better perspective to the culture. I think that Sohn’s book is useful
in adding to the conversation on how Appalachian culture is constructed in
American culture. It is generally perceived as being behind the rest of the
country but this book helps to identify that Appalachia is in no hurry to
attempt catching up. These rural communities in the hills enjoy their culture
and will hold onto their way of life as long as possible.
I thought you did a nice job sharing your thoughts on the book and analyzing it. I also agree in which I found it interesting and surprising that in this society the men are less likely to graduate high school and don't value education as a way to leave Appalachia and better themselves. I also agree with how it felt like the book was dragging on and I thought some things were redundant. I thought the book was educational to me as a student because I have never really studied life in Appalachia before.
ReplyDelete